READINGS
-Jacobowitz & Browning, Ch. 8.
—ABA Formal Opinion No. 488
—Baseball, Kenesaw Mountain Landis, and the Judicial Strike Zone - Home Run or Foul on the Play?
—Fogel, J., “Mindfulness and Judging” Federal Judicial Center (2016).
VIDEO
The Mindful Lawyer Podcast with Attorney and former Mindfulness in Law Student, David Stuzin. Click here.
HOME
MINDFULNESS PRACTICE
1. Practice your Present Moment Pivot. Be prepared to discuss what you may observe taking place/changing over time, especially with regard to:
Interrupting
Opening
Enriching
Rippling
2. Practice the Focused Attention practice for 6, 12, or 18 minutes.
VISA
RESOURCE
MATERIALS
--ABA Journal (Lawyer Caught in Lie)
--Facebook Friending and Judicial Recusal
--Stand Up to the Bar
--Federal Judge’s Email
--Judicial Disqualification
--Anonymity and the Judge
--More on Lawmiss
--Judge Banned from Bench
--"All Things Considered" NPR (4 mins).
—US Supreme Court Upholds Florida's Prohibition on Judge's Personally Soliciting Contributions
—Jacobowitz & Sasser, Judges and Lawyers as Social Media Friends
SOME RELEVANT RULES
Model Code of Judicial Conduct
Mindful Ethics:
Professional Responsibility for
Lawyers in the Digital Age
Class Ten
October 29
To Friend or Not to Friend: Who’s to Judge?
It has been six years since the publicity surrounding Mindy’s blog about Judge Ono.The incident created so much publicity that Mindy became a local hero. With a great reputation as a criminal defense lawyer and the backing of the defense bar, Mindy is encouraged to become a circuit court judge. Judge Ono is running for re-election and Mindy decides to run against him. While the public does not appreciate the significance of the events of six years earlier, the local bar finds the election electrifying. Mindy wins a close race and feels vindicated.
At the time of the election, Mindy decides to stop accepting friends on her Facebook page, which she ramped up when she ran for judge and cuts loose the handful of attorneys who she had initially accepted as “friends.” While some states have approved judges having friends on Facebook, the approval often comes with a caution about the appearance of impropriety.
Mindy decides to use her Facebook page to educate the public about the legal system. She posts about her upcoming and ongoing trials.
However, she is not sure what to do about her more personal “Mindy Moo” page that does not identify her explicitly. She has been using it for more than five years and it has been a great way for her to keep in touch with close friends.
Mindy thinks it over and decides to keep it since there is no obvious way for anyone to know it is her or that “Mindy Moo” is a judge. She is careful not to write anything related to her work.
Mindy embraces her role as judge and likes the prestige that comes with it. Lawyers often offer her tickets to local sporting events and theater. One firm has even invited her to join some of the partners on their private plan to travel to Greece to learn about the origins of the legal profession.
Click here to download file.
Please answer concisely, but completely and include references to the applicable Rules of Professional Conduct, Ethics Opinions and the assigned reading.
1. What are the main judicial canons that are implicated when a judge uses social media?
2. Should Mindy and other judges be able to maintain Facebook friendships and LinkedIn connections? Why or why not?
3. Do you think that judges should use of social media to educate the public and enhance the reputation of our justice system?